Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Greenburg

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

=[[Michael Greenburg]]=

:{{la|Michael Greenburg}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Michael_Greenburg Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Michael Greenburg}})

Delete. Advertorially toned WP:BLP of a film and television producer, which makes potentially valid claims of notability but fails to reliably source them; except for one legitimate reference which verifies a fact about his brother rather than being even minimally about him, every single other source present here at all is either primary or user-generated. In addition, the article has been directly edited by both the subject himself and a person directly named in the article as a collaborator of his, constituting conflict of interest editing. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source an article about him properly, but Wikipedia is not a free advertising platform on which anybody's entitled to keep an article that's written and sourced like this. Bearcat (talk) 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly advertorial content and largely unsourced. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:57, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.