Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hepburn

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Moot. New article is about different subject that prior articles- which was speedied.. Courcelles (talk) 11:00, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

=[[Michael Hepburn]]=

:{{la|Michael Hepburn}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hepburn}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Michael Hepburn}})

Appears to fail ARTIST based on a lack of independent sources available to substantiate impact. I find no matches in Google News or Google Books. The current text of the article has been pasted from the artist's own website. Fæ (talk) 13:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 14:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete No sources no article. TFD (talk) 07:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete as per nom. Also listed as a potential copyvio, as I don't see any evidence that the author of that text has granted the appropriate license. --j⚛e decker ^talk 04:54, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Delete I don't see how we're supposed to judge the notability of an article if its content has been deleted on copyright grounds. However I saw the article as it stood before the deletion, it was me who put the notability flag on it, and I was about to prod it anyway. PatGallacher (talk) 18:22, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Comment This AFD discussion should now be closed as an admin has speedily deleted the article. The new Michael Hepburn article is about a different person. PatGallacher (talk) 18:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.