Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Paulkovich

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:36, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Michael Paulkovich]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Michael Paulkovich}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Michael_Paulkovich Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Michael Paulkovich}})

Fails WP:N Notability guidelines. After reviewing page's citations and performing a search both on Google, Bing, and Microsoft Academic I failed to find significant secondary sources for the author. Sources themselves are all primary sources and link to his published work or blogs. Nothing of general note or reference about author at other sources. He certainly fails the criteria at WP:Author given he isn't cited by peers, has not developed significant new concepts or material, nor has generated a significant movement, nor won awards. Squatch347 (talk) 20:53, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:29, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete not a notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Vorbee (talk) 07:37, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete Lacks the significant independent coverage to meet WP:GNG and doesn't meet the notability criteria for authors (or any other SNG). Papaursa (talk) 01:27, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.