Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Robert Evans
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 10:04, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
=[[Michael Robert Evans]]=
:{{la|Michael Robert Evans}} – (
:({{Find sources|Michael Robert Evans}})
Vanity, no sources but Amazon.com — goethean 22:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with the nom. Looks like pure vanity. Can come back later with better sources if they ever materialize. Google does not give any evidence they exist. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:42, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. A few cites in GS but not enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC).
- Weak delete. Promotional language but that can be fixed. His young adult novel 68 Knots is from a respectable small press and I found a few reviews ([http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-172441858.html ForeWord, brief 3-sentence review]; [http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1N1-11F3E751DE0201C0.html Southtown Star merely repeats a sentence or two from the publisher synopsis]; [http://www.coastalboating.net/Resources/Books/BookReviews/Reviews2007/68Knots.html longer review from the Coastal Boating web site]; a couple of personal blogs). And according to WorldCat it's in 167 libraries. That seems a bit slim for WP:AUTHOR for me. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.