Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Wolfeld

:{{la|Michael Wolfeld}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Michael_Wolfeld Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Michael Wolfeld}})

The subject of this article has not itself received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

And he works for Bernstein Medical, which has had its article deleted at AfD. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernstein Medical.

And for Robert M. Bernstein, who has now three times had his article deleted. See here and most recently its G4 speedy deletion when it was recreated with the only difference being that the new editor wrote out the subject's middle name so it appeared as Robert Michael Bernstein. Very persistent. Looks like a gaming of the system.

The article was proded. But a fairly new editor removed the prod. 2604:2000:E016:A700:F993:BCA:C3F0:6EE6 (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

• Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor. Above text is copied from article talk page. I have no opinion on the nomination at this time. --Finngall ^talk 21:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

• Delete Not seeing a path to notability right now. An assistant clinical professor appointment at any medical school doesn't help to meet WP:PROF; he hasn't served as an editor-in-chief, been named to a scholarly academic society or fulfilled any of the other criteria for that guideline. Citation counts are high in clinical medicine, but this subject has written only a small handful of articles and they have hardly been cited. I'm not seeing enough independent/significant coverage to meet WP:GNG either. EricEnfermero (Talk) 08:13, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC).
• Comment It seems that unregistered IP users from the same zip code (as checked by Geolocate) in Manhattan (or one sockpuppet) have made/are making favorable edits to one physician's page (Cameron Rokhsar) and then made/making negative edits to other NYC physician pages, even nominating them for deletion. All of these IP addresses are in the same zip code of Rokhsar's office. The nominating IP user stated above is in that same small NYC zip code as numerous different IP editor(s) that have contributed a lot of content to the Cameron Rokhsar page (which was just reverted by another user). This nomination was nominated for deletion last December from a similar IP address in the same zip code right after that user made favorable edits to Rokhsar's page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2604:2000:E016:A700:8000:ACDB:6C7A:84D5). Also, the IP addresses of December/January edits to Rokhsar's page are similar to user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2604:2000:E016:A700:D4E1:E2A1:3568:3C8 who had nominated several other NYC physician's pages for deletion back in December. This IP user's history in non-existent now that the pages it nominated/negatively edited have been deleted. WikiPolice2017 (talk) 16:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
• delete WP:TOOSOON per above. Jytdog (talk) 06:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.