Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michal Heiman (2nd nomination)

:{{la|Michal Heiman}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Michal Heiman}})

This article violates the "Notability" guideline and the "No indication of importance" guideline. It is essentially simply self-promotion. There is some minor biographical information and lists of shows. The only sources listed are simply passing mentions of shows - nothing independent beyond a simple show review. Having shows and displaying works does not make an artist automatically notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finsternis (talk • contribs) 03:14, 13 October 2011‎ — Finsternis (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Delete - not notable, and not supported by the citations provided. It looks like pure self-promotion. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

• Keep. I cleaned up the article to be much less promotional. Her work is represented in the permanent collections of two notable museums and she just won a major prize; I think that's enough for WP:ARTIST. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:27, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

::*Keep - wow, nice work, David Eppstein, that's quite different (and a lot shorter) - an obvious keep, clearly Verifiable, a Notable artist. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:45, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:36, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:40, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

• Keep. Notable per GNG. Nom, who I recognize has 13 edits to his name so is new, should become conversant with wp:before before nominating further articles. The same goes for his other AfD -- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reuben D. Jones.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

• Keep satisfies WP:BIO — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:53, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
• Keep. In light of the recent significant improvements to the article, I retract my nomination for deletion. And Epeefleche, I note that my nomination of this article has resulted in a huge increase in its quality. Not all new folks are useless. Finsternis (talk) 21:15, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.