Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Rogers

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was REDIRECT. postdlf (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

=[[Michele Rogers]]=

:{{la|Michele Rogers}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Michele Rogers}})

Non-notable model. There's not much to say about her other that the fact that she was a playmate. Damiens.rf 19:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete - Article does not meet general notability criteria.--יום יפה (talk) 20:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 2002. Does not appear to be enough nontrivial reliably sourced content to justify an independent article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:56, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Delete - Playmate of the month does not meet the WP:GNG or the WP:PORNBIO threshold. Tarc (talk) 19:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.