Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Newell

:{{la|Michelle Newell}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Michelle Newell}})

Unreferenced BLP. Unremarkable actress, fails WP:ENT and WP:GNG. doomgaze (talk) 20:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Keep - the article is just a stub at the moment, so everything there is referenced by the linked IMDb entry. Although not particularly famous as an actress, plenty of pages from various productions link to her and it they will look a lot worse with redlinks. According to her [http://www.pfd.co.uk/client/michelle_newell/books/ agent biography], she has been in plenty of things and is also a published novelist. I don't see any reason to delete it - there is enough notablity here, although I may look into adding a few more references. Bob talk 22:19, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

::I've added a few additional references. Bob talk 23:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

• Keep, meets WP:ENT through multiple recurring roles in TV series as well as very lengthy list of nontrivial acting credits. Needs expansion, but no problematic content requiring immediate action. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
• Keep per Hullaballoo Wolfowitz.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 03:15, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.