Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle judicatory

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Middle judicatory}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Middle judicatory}})

Religious terminology. This is certainly a thing that exists, as Google Books results show. But the article is essentially unsourced and marked as such since 2021. The one source is an apparently WP:SPS "research report" that is barely comprehensible and does not appear to support the article's contents. In particular, there is no source confirming that the various religious structures listed in the article are "middle judicatories". Unless properly sourced, this article has no place in an encyclopedia, per WP:V (let alone WP:N). Sandstein 22:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Christianity. Sandstein 22:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. I've substantially expanded this article (per WP:HEY) with references to numerous reliable sources. The concept definitely passes WP:GNG, although the nominator did not define which notability standard they thought it failed, and the article also passes WP:V. I also cleaned up the list of links to judicatories. With the original nomination rationale no longer valid, I'd ask {{ping|Sandstein}} to consider withdrawing the nomination. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
• Withdrawn in view of sourced rewrite; thanks! Sandstein 21:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.