Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midwest Sports Fans
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Midwest Sports Fans}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midwest Sports Fans}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Midwest Sports Fans}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:14, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
=[[:Midwest Sports Fans]]=
:{{la|1=Midwest Sports Fans}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Midwest Sports Fans}})
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of secondary sources. Let'srun (talk) 17:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Websites. Let'srun (talk) 17:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:28, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. This e-publication is not notable (lack of in-depth coverage of the publication itself, in independent reliable sources), notwithstanding that it was involved in a short-term controversy about what it said about a particular player. The controversy (which accounts for most mentions of this blog in sources) is not itself notable, and is at best a minor side point in the player's bio article (it probably passes the WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE test). PS: If the article is kept, it needs to have its citations repaired; many of them are abusing the {{para|title}} parameter to provide misc. annotations instead of the titles of the articles they link to, most are missing dates and other key information, etc. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 18:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.