Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike de Geer

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. {{nac}} Nomination withdrawn, all !votes to keep (non-admin closure) Polygnotus (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Mike de Geer]]=

:{{la|1=Mike de Geer}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Mike de Geer}})

A Dutch professional footballer. Page fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. BlakeIsHereStudios (talk | contributions) 12:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep - clearly no attempt at a BEFORE, giving a very quick Google for this guy brings up [https://haaglandenvoetbal.nl/nieuws/96536/hvv-verlengt-contract-met-hoofdtrainer-mike-de-geer/ 1], [https://www.ad.nl/regiosport-den-haag/mike-de-geer-stopt-bij-hbs-tidde-tromp-naar-de-kraaien~ab5f61b5/ 2], [https://haaglandenvoetbal.nl/nieuws/102481/oefenvoetbal-scheveningen-met-als-coach-mike-de-geer-langs-hbs/ 3], [https://www.voetbal.com/speler_profiel/mike-de-geer/ 4], [https://hethaagsamateurvoetbal.nl/mike-de-geer-assistent-trainer-andre-wetzel/ 5], [https://www.oozo.nl/nieuws/s-gravenhage/4018905/oefenvoetbal-scheveningen-met-als-coach-mike-de-geer-langs-hbs 6], [https://nl.soccerway.com/players/mike-de-geer/65047/ 7], [https://www.omroepwest.nl/sport/3831549/mike-de-geer-stopt-nu-definitief-bij-hbs-over-drie-weken-is-het-echt-klaar 8]. Clearly a notable figure. Giant Snowman 12:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Netherlands. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Keep passes WP:BASIC for me on sources added by GS. Govvy (talk) 13:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Keep. Unclear why this article was nominated. Neither fails SPORTCRIT or the GNG. The nomination does fail NEXIST and BEFORE. gidonb (talk) 14:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep – Per @GiantSnowman. Svartner (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

:Withdraw: This nomination was meaningless. The page does pass WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT and research proves his notability. Duke of New Gwynedd (talk | contrib.) 17:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.