Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikhail Butkevich
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 04:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
=[[:Mikhail Butkevich]]=
:{{la|Mikhail Butkevich}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Mikhail Butkevich}})
Lack of individual notability. Unsourced article since 2006. XXN, 14:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep -- Notability clearly established by:
:* {{Cite journal|last=Chambers|first=David|last2=Krivosheyev|first2=Maxim|date=2016-07-02|title=Mikhail Butkevich: the bridge to the contemporary Russian avant-garde|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20567790.2016.1234017|journal=Stanislavski Studies|volume=4|issue=2|pages=125–135|doi=10.1080/20567790.2016.1234017|issn=2056-7790}}
:* {{Cite web|url=http://search.proquest.com/openview/c7b258d056f2da6d/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=21991|title=Mikhail Butkevich's Theatre of Players: Theatre and the Art of the Game - ProQuest|website=search.proquest.com|language=en|access-date=2017-01-22}}
: Υπογράφω (talk) 22:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Snow keep. The sources {{u|Υπογράφω}} found provide a solid basis for notability ("a crucial figure in the development of contemporary Russian theatre"), and googling turns up numerous other mentions. This looks like a bit of a WP:BEFORE malfunction to me. – Joe (talk) 18:53, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
::... "looks like", but it's not!
::And you really think this is enough to establish his notability? Reading his biography [http://www.rulit.me/authors/butkevich-mihail-mihajlovich here] I didn't saw nothing which makes him remarcable. Even in ru.wikipedia they don't have and never had an article about this person. "Snow keep" he says... XXN, 19:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
:::Being the subject of two full articles in peer-reviewed journals and mentioned in several other scholarly sources is more than enough to establish notability per WP:ANYBIO. The text I quoted above also clearly indicates Butkevich satisfies criterion 1 of WP:CREATIVE, "the person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors". – Joe (talk) 08:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep -- clearly notable. I added a citation and ext link: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikhail_Butkevich&type=revision&diff=762436081&oldid=761357497 diff]. This article looks especially compelling:
:*[http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20567790.2016.1234017?journalCode=rfst20 "Mikhail Butkevich: the bridge to the contemporary Russian avant-garde"], in ''Stanislavski Studies: Practice, Legacy, and Contemporary Theater, Volume 4, 2016 - Issue 2
:--K.e.coffman (talk) 20:29, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.