Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milton Blain

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:03, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Milton Blain]]=

:{{la|Milton Blain}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milton Blain}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Milton Blain}})

Biography sourced solely to an obituary published by a local council. I cannot find any source to backup the assertion that he was important in Queensland's history nor that he was particularly important in respect of Gladstone. While it is apparent that he was important to the region - hence the "Citizen of the Year" award from Gladstone council - no reliable sources appear to have cared to write about him. Peripitus (Talk) 06:30, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 GoUSA 21:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{BASEPAGENAME}}|Articles for deletion||}}

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 chat 02:24, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete already. No one's come forth with any arguments in favor, and I can't find anything either. Or just let it get relisted another 9001 times; it's obvious no one cares. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:56, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete - no reason for keeping provided, no need to relist. SmokingNewton (talk) 05:11, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.