Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimi Kirkland (2nd nomination)

:{{la|Mimi Kirkland}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mimi_Kirkland_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Mimi Kirkland}})

Child actress that only gets the most passing mentions in the usual places (e.g. Variety, THR, EW, Deadline, LA Times) – she receives no in-depth coverage that I can see. Certainly fails WP:GNG, and likely fails WP:NACTOR. At best, a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:18, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:19, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:19, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

• {{Note:}} Previous AfD discussion in 2012 came to the conclusion of delete, and the sourcing in the current article is basically non-existent, so this may even qualify for "speedy delete"(?). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
• Delete - Page qualifies for BLP PROD because it is completely unsourced. Regardless, subject is only mentioned in passing in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 02:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

• Keep and source: The previous AfD was FOUR years ago... she's still acting, so I think, if sourcing can be improved, she meets NACTOR. Montanabw^(talk) 05:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
• [sigh...] Did you read the nominating statement?! – I checked the usual places for RS before bringing this here, and all there were were "passing mentions", at best. She simply hasn't gotten a significant enough role at this point to have generated "notable" press coverage. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 06:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
• Delete: aside from the fact that the sole reference is IMDb, she is a very young child actress whose career consists of recurring roles on two consecutive relatively little-known TV series beginning 2014 (per IMDb) and one credit a year earlier. Way TOO SOON. This article has stage mother written all over it. Quis separabit? 20:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
• Comment: A TV show on the Disney channel is a pretty big deal for a child actor. While I agree that the username of the article's primary editor does raise a COI concern, we need to assess the article itself on its merits. Montanabw^(talk) 18:10, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
• And the "merits" are a lack of significant, independent coverage. IOW, WP:TOOSOON. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
• Delete We need a lot more than IMDB to keep an article on a child of 12.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
• Delete and Redirect only if needed instead as the only longest work is 22 episodes and there's nothing convincing at all from there. SwisterTwister talk 05:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.