Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mind your Ps and Qs

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) — Benison (Beni · talk) 16:42, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Mind your Ps and Qs]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Mind your Ps and Qs}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Mind your Ps and Qs}})

dictionary definition of an English phrase with speculation about its etymology, cited to primary sources. wikt:mind one's ps and qs accomplishes what this is trying to do much better. and rightly so, for Wikipedia is not a dictionary. TryKid[dubiousdiscuss] 15:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

  • keep, cleanup. valid Wikipedia article. --Altenmann >talk 16:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
  • keep, there's nothing much wrong with the article, and it's certainly an encyclopedic topic. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep. There is a grey area that's hard to sort between here and Wiktionary. The test is whether this is merely an (etymological) dictionary entry WP:DICT. My feeling is that where the social/historical interest in a phrase's origin outweighs the linguistic information about how it's used, it's possible to have a social/historically-biased encyclopedia entry. This doesn't preclude having a linguistically-biased dictionary entry in Wiktionary. It's not either/or. This particular phrase is interesting enough, and sufficiently sourced, to pass. Elemimele (talk) 17:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep: The nominator's statement that the wiktionary page "accomplishes what this is trying to do much better" is incorrect. The Wikipedia article is much more in-depth. Toughpigs (talk) 18:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:BEFORE. A search on Google books would have been appreciated. Bearian (talk) 06:54, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep per Elemimele's argument. Toughpigs (talk) 16:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.