Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minrajsankul

=[[Minrajsankul]]=

:{{la|Minrajsankul}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Minrajsankul}})

Primary schools are almost never notable by themselves. Unless this school can qualify under WP:GNG with multiple independent reliable sources, it should be deleted. Since it appears to be a private school, there probably isn't any good redirect target, except for maybe the city. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:27, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete - it is one of a series of articles that have been created by User:KanaraBrijraj and subsequently deleted by the community. I have the feeling that user may also be User:MrBrijraj and there have been definite spammy aspects to the various articles. I can find nothing to support WP:GNG. - Sitush (talk) 15:41, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete - research has not provided any further information that could even justify redirecting to the locality. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:40, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete - no philosophy of education at the school is offered, no curriculum, and the external reference is still under construction. Article is of no real notability.--Whiteguru (talk) 10:38, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.