Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MinuteMenCreatives
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 18:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
=[[MinuteMenCreatives]]=
:{{la|MinuteMenCreatives}} – (
:({{Find sources|MinuteMenCreatives}})
Fewer than 1000 hits on Google, entirely promotional. Jamesx12345 17:42, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Appears to have no evidence of notability, ultimately fails the general notability guideline with no substantial coverage. Tutelary (talk) 18:30, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
::I concur. Reads like blatant advertisement. GethN7 (talk) 00:08, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.