Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam David

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure), as per unanimous consensus. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:01, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

=[[Miriam David]]=

:{{la|Miriam David}} ([{{fullurl:Miriam David|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam David}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Unsourced biography of a non-notable professor/author. Blatant conflict of interest. Contested prod. BradV 19:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Keep I added some references. Note that she was elected to the Academy of Learned Societies in the Social Sciences. --Eastmain (talk) 20:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 20:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 20:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
keep Along the lines of Eastmain's point. FRSA, Should be added to :Category:Fellows of the Royal Society of Arts... Pete.Hurd (talk) 23:06, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Keep A major academic in the field of education, DGG (talk) 03:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Keep Thanks to Eastmain for the references. Edward321 (talk) 04:51, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Keep --A professor in UK is not a mere lecturer, but a very senior academic and almost certainly notable for being a professor. This differs from USA usage. I note that there is a conflict of interest template. Looking at the history, I cannot see where this come from. the article was created by TRRL and cited a TRRL website. That might be inappropriate self-citation, but is not a COI with the subject. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.