Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Steinel

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 21:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Miriam Steinel]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Miriam Steinel}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Miriam Steinel}})

Fails WP:NSKATE, WP:SPORTSBASIC, and WP:GNG. Only competed at the junior level and never medaled in the one junior figure skating competition we recognize as significant. 4meter4 (talk) 01:02, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Comment: A bronze medal at the Junior Grand Prix Final is a notable achievement, although I realize it is not included on the list of criteria for WP:NSKATE. That competition is one notch below the World Junior Championships. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:19, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

::Consensus was not to include that level of achievement at the SNG for figure skaters when it was crafted by the community, so from a wiki community guideline point of view it isn’t notable unless there is GNG level sourcing that supports that. The junior level of skating doesn’t typically get SIGCOV outside of the World Junior Championship medalists.4meter4 (talk) 06:37, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete: I am also unable to find enough coverage to support keeping the article. The win could be notable with some good sources; I tried a newspaper search, nothing turns up. Oaktree b (talk) 00:09, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:33, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete: Subject does not appear to have the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG either here or elsewhere. In addition, the corresponding German article has nothing to offer besides database sources. Let'srun (talk) 14:55, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete Not enough WP:RS coverage and fails adequate WP:GNG levels. Go4thProsper (talk) 16:36, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.