Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misamis University

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Misamis University}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Misamis University}})

A non-notable institution with virtually nothing I could find that can verify the notability of the institution. Looking through the history of the article since its creation, it managed to slip through the cracks of what's needed in an article, sources. Sources about the subject are an important element. But not a single one has ever been added to this article. The only link is to the school's website which does not count as an independent source or a source in general unless a page from there can provide a reference. But it doesn't. My PROD of the article was removed because "a higher-education institute founded in 1929 is likely to have independent sources." Not in this case. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Philippines. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep. Appears to be an accredited degree-awarding institution. WP:CONSENSUS has generally been that we keep these. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

::You're gonna have to provide evidence of your claim. Appearing to be is not much of an argument. Notability is the main concern here. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:13, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep added cites as a CHED recognized Center of Development. That means that MU is up there with the Universities in the national capital region in certain academic disciplines. The University's accreditation, as suggested by Necrothesp, is confirmed by its Deregulated Status. That also means that the University is free from CHED's monitoring when it comes to curriculum building.--Lenticel ^(talk) 02:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep Meets WP:NSCHOOL per Lenticel's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 00:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep per above, clearly meets criteria. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 13:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.