Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss USA 2016

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus, though slim, is to keep. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

=[[Miss USA 2016]]=

:{{la|Miss USA 2016}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Miss_USA_2016 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Miss USA 2016}})

Crystal bol with no date or venue known. No independent sources conform WP:RS. Created by a now blocked sockpuppet. Article might be unreliable due to edits of an editor who is placing misinformation and hoaxes The Banner talk 12:31, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Strong keep as subject easily crosses verifiability and notability thresholds. Satisfying point 1 of WP:CRYSTAL, this event is both notable and "almost certain" to take place. Widespread news coverage [http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2015/10/28/donald-trump-sells-miss-universe-and-miss-usa-to-fox/74751342/ like this] [http://deadline.com/2015/10/miss-universe-miss-usa-pageant-fox-pick-up-img-1201596569/ and this] confirm the new broadcast contracts and this will be the 65th in an annual series of such events. Coverage of individual contestants is also [http://www.al.com/living/index.ssf/2015/11/peyton_brown_of_eufaula_crowne.html easy to find] and will only proliferate as more state winners are chosen. I have added several reliable sources to the article. - Dravecky (talk) 10:50, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Strong Keep: The subject is notable and verifiable. It will be held within 12 months and is properly sourced. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 13:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Please read WP:RS again. Angelopedia.com is clearly not an independent source. The Banner talk 20:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Weak Keep - This is one of those events that are notable, Admittingly sourcing's not amazing but notability does seem to be there. –Davey2010^Talk 00:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.