Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitemcinal

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as withdrawn by nominator. Non admin closure. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 18:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Mitemcinal]]=

:{{la|Mitemcinal}} ([{{fullurl:Mitemcinal|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitemcinal}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Article on a rejected drug. WP:NOTE? King ♣ Talk 19:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Strong Keep Whether or not it was rejected is irrelevant--[http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=Mitemcinal&sa=N&tab=ws&um=1] demonstrates a high volume of quality articles written in detail about the drug in peer-reviewed journals, dates I see ranging from 2004-2007. There is absolutely no question here of notability in my eyes. Cazort (talk) 21:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep, per {{PMID|19345243}}, {{PMID|18940266}} and {{PMID|11566017}}. Tim Vickers (talk) 21:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep, looks like Tim has the information that backs up the article. It's good. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Note See also: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 June 22#3'-N-dimethyl-11-deoxy-3'-N-isopropyl-12-O-methyl-11-oxo-8,9-didehydroerythromycin. EVula // talk // ☯ // 03:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

:I stand corrected. Withdrawn. --King ♣ Talk 17:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.