Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mladen Stanisic
=[[Mladen Stanisic]]=
:{{la|Mladen Stanisic}} ([{{fullurl:Mladen Stanisic|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mladen Stanisic}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Promotion, possible hoax. Previously deleted article created by SPA w/o much of a believable claim to notability. Gnews returns nothing on Stanisic or his "eco-club"; the refs used are rather dubious - Djecji klub magazine doesn't appear to exist (at least after my own search), the Boomerang mag ad looks like a gag, and a Twitter account of course doesn't meet WP:RS. The article offers nothing outside the lead on his acting/singing. Mbinebri talk ← 19:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete- per Nomination. I was considering to nominate it too. Total self promotion. Hitro talk 19:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as either hoax or non-notable. Drawn Some (talk) 01:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Both Boomerang and Djecji klub exist!!!
http://www.yu4you.com/items/en/casopis/item_190.html - Boomerang found on online shopping sites
http://www.modriani.co.yu/sr/klijenti.html - Boomerang is published by Luxor
http://ultratv.rs/ - Photo advertisement for Boomerang on the website of the leading kids TV station in Serbia
You searched for "Boomerang magazine" instead of "casopis Boomerang" which is on the Serbian language!
http://jutarnjiklub.com/artikl/203 - Djecji klub magazine (casopis Djecji klub on Croatian) available in online shopping stores
http://online.konzum.hr/categories/5471896/products/50016202 - Another online shop selling Djecji klub
http://www.eph.hr/eng/products_and_services/index.html - Djecji klub listed as a publication of EPH (EuropaPressHolding)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europapress_Holding - Wikipedia article on the publisher of Djecji klub
http://pravonarazvoj.crolink.net/ - Djecji klub said to be an important magazine for kids' mental growth
http://www.kgz.hr/gradska/djecji/casopisi.asp - Djecji klub available in libraries
THOSE ARE 9 PROOFS! DO YOU NEED MORE?!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.189.218.213 (talk) 07:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Comment- I still stand by my vote. Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable secondary sources. The links above may verify the existence of the sources but I do not think it verifies notability of the subject. Hitro talk 18:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.