Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Mahran
=[[Mohamed Mahran]]=
:{{la|Mohamed Mahran}} – (
:({{Find sources|Mohamed Mahran}})
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that the Egyptian Second Division is fully pro, an assertion not supported by reliable sources. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:40, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
:{{la|Sayed Mostafa}} {{Find sources|Sayed Mostafa}}
:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete both Mohamed Mahran - appearances only in the Polish second-tier league [http://uk.soccerway.com/players/mohamed-ahmed-mahran-shehata/274761/]. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Sayed Mostafa - Can't even find him in soccerway, but the refs given are also for second-tier teams, so he also fails to meet the notability guideline. §FreeRangeFrog 19:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 21:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 21:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 21:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 08:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete both - articles is about footballers who hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented their country at senior level, which means that the articles fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 13:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.