Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Hossein Khan

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. T. Canens (talk) 04:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Mohammad Hossein Khan]]=

:{{la|Mohammad Hossein Khan}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mohammad_Hossein_Khan Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Mohammad Hossein Khan}})

:({{Find sources AFD|Muhammad Husayn Khan}})

No biographical information actually included, aside from name. Unfocused and confusing article. Not clear how it helps in understanding any topic. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 20:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:34, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:34, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete extraordinary claims require extraordinary sources. If Khan was such a central figure in Istafan in the early-19th century, we should have more sources on him.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Smmurphy(Talk) 18:15, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Probably redirect somewhere. This has the feel of becoming a redirect with possibilities, if someone can find enough to make an article, rather than a stub. Peterkingiron (talk) 00:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Comment - subject is clearly notable in a BEFORE. The Persian article seems adequately sourced. And in English - the number and diversity of book hits in English seems to indicate importance. What is really needed here is a Persian speaker willing to do cleanup.Icewhiz (talk) 14:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
  • : Keep following improved sourcing in article.Icewhiz (talk) 22:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Comment I'm inclined to agree that there is something here to work with: [https://books.google.com/books?id=dxJIAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Mohammad+Hossein+Khan%22+isfahan&dq=%22Mohammad+Hossein+Khan%22+isfahan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiFotuUz-7YAhWkhOAKHRNfB_oQ6AEIJzAA Iran Almanac and Book of Facts, Volume 8 (1969)] ("Iran is surprisingly rich in the field of archaeology. A modest effort was made in the early years or the 19th Century to preserve some of them. The first on record is by Haj Mohammad Hossein Khan Sadre-Esfahani who undertook such repairs in Isfahan at his own expense during the reign of Fath Ali Shah.") Not sure whether the best approach is to keep or to merge to Isfahan 24.151.116.12 (talk) 17:42, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Keep and possibly rename to Muhammad Husayn Khan, the more common spelling. I'm expanding the article a bit, including adding a couple sources. Smmurphy(Talk) 19:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Keep per the improvements, and you can just move it to the name you have suggested when this closes as far as I am concerned. 24.151.116.12 (talk) 19:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 00:18, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep per notability being established. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:44, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Keep per improvements and sourcing by {{U|Smmurphy}}. Sufficient notability demonstrated at this time. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:53, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.