Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Reza Eslami

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Theopolisme (talk) 20:48, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

=[[Mohammad Reza Eslami]]=

:{{la|Mohammad Reza Eslami}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mohammad_Reza_Eslami Stats])

:({{Find sources|Mohammad Reza Eslami}})

Not notable. lack of independent sources to prove notability. In fact 15:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

:3 days ago It was deleted for the very same reason [http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%88%DB%8C%DA%A9%DB%8C%E2%80%8C%D9%BE%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%A7:%D9%86%D8%B8%D8%B1%D8%AE%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%87%DB%8C_%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%A7%DB%8C_%D8%AD%D8%B0%D9%81/%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%B6%D8%A7_%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85%DB%8C in the Persian Wikipedia]. In fact 08:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep Membership in Iranian Academy of Sciences confirmed by [http://www.ias.ac.ir/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=90&Itemid=401&lang=en]. That said, I'm deleting the claim to be an ASME fellow, as verification failed on that score [http://files.asme.org/asmeorg/Governance/Honors/Fellows/31147.pdf]. RayTalk 04:35, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:PROF#C3 (the academy membership). Also, his citation record in Google scholar (four papers with over 100 cites each) is enough to make a plausible case for #C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:49, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Comment Most of the claims in the article including the awards and the books are unsourced ! In fact 05:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep. A GS h-index of 20 in an average cited field passes WP:Prof#C1 (Search for "M R Eslami"). Xxanthippe (talk) 22:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.