Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Motasin Ali Lodi

=[[Mohammed Motasin Ali Lodi]]=

:{{la|Mohammed Motasin Ali Lodi}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Mohammed Motasin Ali Lodi}})

Creator of this page has removed the Speedy deletion tag from this article. And there are no references for this biography article. AssassiN's Creed (talk) 05:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete The CSD should not have been removed. No sources cited whatsoever, possibly a cruft article.Whiteguru (talk) 12:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep at least for now. (Changing to Delete because no reliable sources have been produced.) I removed the autobiography tag placed by AssassiN's Creed as the subject died in 1948 so the article is not an autobiography. This is a stub about an early 20th century Moslem leader in what is now Pakistan. It is not "cruft", which by the way is not a valid argument for deletion. Reliable sources may well exist in other versions of a name which has been transliterated from another language. I will support deletion if an editor with the appropriate language skills verifies that the person is not notable. Cullen328 (talk) 13:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

:*This is salvageable only with refs and a rewrite. And being crufty is a valid reason for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 15:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Weak keep for now--this is a really poorly written article, but it might be a notable topic. Why not give it a few months on cleanup--it may improve? Meelar (talk) 22:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep, per Meelar too. The article was just created yesterday, and the new corner should get a chance to improve it and correct our concerns, IMO. ~ AdvertAdam talk 05:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC) ~ AdvertAdam talk 20:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.