Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Mussa Yakubi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:55, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

=[[Mohammed Mussa Yakubi]]=

:{{la|Mohammed Mussa Yakubi}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mohammed_Mussa_Yakubi Stats])

:({{Find sources|Mohammed Mussa Yakubi}})

On a living Guantanamo prisoner (now released). Fails WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:BIO, WP:GNG. There are no secondary sources to claim notability of the subject and the citations used are WP:PRIMARY sources (WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 84#Reliability of US military summary reports) DBig Xray 20:21, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

:{{#if:yes|Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. |{{error|This template must be substituted!}}}} • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

:{{#if:yes|Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. |{{error|This template must be substituted!}}}} • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

:{{#if:yes|Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. |{{error|This template must be substituted!}}}} • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Merge and redirect to Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay, for the reasons explained by the nom. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:13, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Redirect, there are a copy of his combatant review hosted by the New York Times, but I did not find other significant coverage regarding the subject of the article. As a member of a notable group, a redirect can be left in the article place to Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay. It can be argued that the document is significant coverage, however if every case that is put online about an individual warrants significant coverage than every publicly available case about a convicted felon would thus make the felon notable.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 15:55, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete - lacks "significant coverage" in reliable sources required for notability under WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 06:19, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete, per nom. Mentions in trial transcripts do not confer notability, and there is complete lack of significant and specific coverage by secondary published reliable sources. Manifestly fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Given that the creator of this article has created what appears to be dozens or more likely hundreds similar articles on manifestly non-notable individuals that are currently sitting in mainspace and need to be deleted, the "merge" option is unrealistic here. Nobody has the time to sift through this mountain of obscure non-notable material and figure out what and how and where may be merged here. It should simply be deleted, period. Nsk92 (talk) 13:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.