Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Said Hjiouj El-Sahili

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Mohammed Said Hjiouj El-Sahili]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Mohammed Said Hjiouj El-Sahili}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Mohammed Said Hjiouj El-Sahili}})

I believe that this article does not meet WP:GNG and I couldn't find any RS on google. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 23:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 23:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 23:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:48, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

  • What do you make of the sources cited in the article? Phil Bridger (talk) 10:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep Author seems notable. --Gazal world (talk) 17:08, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 03:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep, possibly speedy keep per WP:CSK #3 unless someone explains what's wrong with the seemingly independent, in-depth, reliable sources cited in this page and on the Arabic version of the page, and the dozens more that come up in WP:BEFORE. [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF+%D8%B3%D8%B9%D9%8A%D8%AF+%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%AC%D9%8A%D9%88%D8%AC%22&sxsrf=ALeKk00y_HcbvWEXDWTSYMkHdmeyzLIaoQ:1610860794624&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwilrsiLnKLuAhWjs1kKHd_TAhkQ_AUoAnoECAsQBA&biw=1920&bih=937 How much more coverage is needed]? - Astrophobe (talk) 05:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep. No explanation from the nominator as to what is wrong with the sources provided. Mccapra (talk) 08:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.