Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohd June Azral Lalah
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 20:42, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
=[[:Mohd June Azral Lalah]]=
:{{la|Mohd June Azral Lalah}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Mohd June Azral Lalah}})
Badly sourced stub on a footballer that has never played in a league listed at WP:FPL; Sabah, Beverly and DYS were all playing outside the Super League when this footballer was playing for them; therefore, there is no claim to passing WP:NFOOTBALL. The article's [http://web-old.archive.org/web/20100123194038/http://www.newsabahtimes.com.my/nstweb/fullstory/35260 one source] is only a passing mention. Google searches and a [https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22Mohd+June+Azral+Lalah%22&t=hd&va=o&ia=web Malaysian search] do not come back with any relevant hits in WP:RS, therefore the subject does not appear to pass WP:GNG and should be considered for deletion. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 20:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom (reminds me of Groundhog Day), fails GNG and NFOOTBALL CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:45, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - No significant coverage about the subject, hence fails WP:GNG. Alvaldi (talk) 10:31, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- 'Delete: as per above, no significant coverage about the subject, hence fails WP:GNG. How this got past New Page Patrol, I don't know. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete the article fails GNG which is the minimum guideline for inclusion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.