Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohe Rang Do Laal

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Mohe Rang Do Laal}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mohe_Rang_Do_Laal Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Mohe Rang Do Laal}})

The song won four awards and the content can very well be incorporated in the soundtrack article. - Vivvt (Talk) 08:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

• Comment. Can you elaborate on your rationale for deletion as it does not make any sense to me. In particular, what is the policy-based reason for deletion? SpinningSpark 12:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
• Comment - In the article's "Accolades" table, there are seven wins/nominations with citations, but most of the resulting links are defunct. I was able to confirm that footnotes 7 and 13 (current numbers) support the fact that the song received those accolades. If all of the other accolades can be supported with functioning sources, the song probably has enough awards to qualify for its own article. I would support a Keep vote in that case. Meanwhile, it looks like the nominator supports a merge to the parent soundtrack album, which could be done boldly. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:54, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

:* Most of the information from the lead section is either present in the soundtrack article. Plus, there is no information about its making or inception or video. Accolades can be put into parent article as well. I did not move it boldly because the creator is singer's fan and has been contributing accordingly. He has reverted me elsewhere so did not want to start edit warring. - Vivvt (Talk) 08:31, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

• Keep. It is disappointing that the nominator cannot be bothered to explain their nomination after being asked and this has had to go to a relist. The nomination says that "the song won four awards". This is a rationale for "keep", not "delete". All eight of the awards in the table are blue-linked and presumably notable. The song has a lot of news coverage so their is a prima facie case for notability. SpinningSpark 08:38, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
• I felt there was no option but to relist given the lack of input (just a question asked of the nominator and one user profferring a comment). This is now trending keep. Enigma^msg 03:44, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
• {{ping|Enigmaman]] There was no intention on my part to imply criticism of your relist. That was a perfectly sensible action. You may have missed though, that User:doomsdayer520 gave a provisional keep if the accolades were sourced. All of them currently have links to functioning sources, at least to an archive copy. SpinningSpark 11:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
• {{ping|Enigmaman}} pinging again because the first one was malformed. SpinningSpark 11:13, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
• I did see that but he or she would need to unqualify that for the closing admin. Enigma^msg 14:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
• I don't think so. If I was closing and the condition was objectively met then I would count a conditional keep. SpinningSpark 15:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
• Keep The song is a winner of a Filmfare award (highest order award in Bollywood), hence passes 2nd point of WP:NSONG. Pratyush (talk) 18:43, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.