Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohr Publicity

=[[Mohr Publicity]]=

:{{la|Mohr Publicity}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mohr_Publicity Stats])

:({{Find sources|Mohr Publicity}})

Non-notable company lacking ghits and Gnews of substance. Claims of notability are not supported by independent sources. Fails WP:COMPANY. reddogsix (talk) 23:24, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete - The article was deleted via CSD A7 and then recreated by a different (newish) editor. I nominated it for CSD A7 again, but it was declined by the reviewing admin. The references in the article almost entirely emanate from press release. I was unable to find any reliable sources the cover the company in any depth. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - MrX 00:03, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

:*Comment - the website toppublicitycompany.info on which one of the references is based, is administered by the owner of the company. reddogsix (talk) 00:13, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete I found absolutely no independent coverage at Google News Archive. Fails WP:CORP. --MelanieN (talk) 00:54, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.