Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Byrne (ice hockey)

:{{la|Molly Byrne (ice hockey)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Molly_Byrne_(ice_hockey) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Molly Byrne (ice hockey)}})

Non-notable amateur ice hockey player who fails to meet WP:GNG. Sources in article are just stats profiles or a passing mention. I could not find any others that meet GNG doing a search. Player also subsequently fails WP:NHOCKEY. DJSasso (talk) 12:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. DJSasso (talk) 12:42, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. DJSasso (talk) 12:42, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

:Delete - was deprodded without rationale a while back. Nom hits the nail on the head. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NCOLLATH, and WP:NHOCKEY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

• Delete: Fails NHOCKEY and NCOLLATH, no evidence the subject meets the GNG. The article creator's seemed to have thrown up a number of these, and I'd be interested in hearing his take on what notability criteria he had in mind when doing so. Ravenswing 18:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

:Comment - Hi {{u|Ravenswing}} - I think they put their rationale on the article's talk page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:16, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

:* Okay, fair enough. He certainly misread the criteria then in place, but that was at least an answer. Ravenswing 01:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

• Delete does not meet the notability guidelines for hockey players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:02, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
• Delete Not enough here for NHOCKEY. Montanabw^(talk) 06:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.