Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monika Horvat

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Monika Horvat]]=

:{{la|Monika Horvat}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Monika_Horvat Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Monika Horvat}})

Participant in a beauty pageant itself of questionable notability. Did not even place in an event that is only a few years old. Peter Rehse (talk) 19:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete. It is not Wikipedia's role to be a comprensive database of every person who ever won any beauty pageant at all, without regard to how minor or how unsourceable it may be, but this article is not referenced even close to well enough to get Monika Horvat over WP:GNG — the little bit of "referencing" present here consists entirely of primary sources, with not even one piece of real reliable source coverage in a real media outlet shown at all. And even the international parent pageant's notability is iffy at best, with its article also much more dependent on its own primary source content about itself than on sufficient evidence of GNG, let alone the lower-level "Miss Grand Canada" title that's all she actually won. So winning a pageant of questionable notability is simply not, in and of itself, an exemption from having to be more reliably sourceable than this. Bearcat (talk) 01:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - Fails general notability criteria, as winner of a non-notable pageant, Miss Grand Canada, and participant in an international event. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete doesn't meet GNG DarjeelingTea (talk) 12:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.