Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monta May
=[[Monta May]]=
:{{la|Monta May}} ([{{fullurl:Monta May|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monta May}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
No assertion of notability whatsoever. Google search brings up no results: [http://www.google.com/search?q=Monta+Mey&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a]. Article's creator is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Montagaelmay Montagaelmay]. I'd say we have the non-notability trifecta... Lithoderm 16:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
:*The provided google search link in the nomination is wrong. Use [http://www.google.com/search?q=(%22Monta+May%22|%22Monta+Gael+May%22) this search] instead. ZabMilenkoHow am I driving? 06:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Lithoderm 17:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom...Modernist (talk) 21:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. The single small article in a regional Daily is not enough to satisfy WP:BIO. Not notable. Enki H. (talk) 00:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy userfy because the article does not assert notability. A check of Google does find the local story, but AfD is usually not the place for those debates. ZabMilenkoHow am I driving? 06:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete not notable.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 17:47, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.