Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montenegrin Australian

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Seems marginally notable. Ruslik_Zero 08:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Montenegrin Australian]]=

:{{la|Montenegrin Australian}} ([{{fullurl:Montenegrin Australian|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montenegrin Australian}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I'm not seeing the notability of an ethnic group of ~1,000 people out of a larger group of 22 million people in Australia. This group makes up .0045 percent of the population of Australia, not even a drop in the bucket... Tavix | Talk 21:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix | Talk 21:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix | Talk 21:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix | Talk 21:20, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
The article was not tagged. I have done so. I have no strong views on this article, but it is useful information that someone might look for and it is referenced, so keep. --Bduke (Discussion) 22:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

:*Twinkle's fault. Tavix | Talk 23:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Keep Size has nothing to do with notability. Topic is covered in other specialist encyclopedias and seems reasonably notable: {{citation|last=Zizic|first=Danilo|chapter=Montenegrins|title=The Australian people: an encyclopedia of the nation, its people, and their origins|editor-last=Jupp|editor-first=James|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2001|isbn=9780521807890}}. cab (talk) 10:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep: notable, verifiable. - Altenmann >t 10:12, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete Doesn't seem a notable designation to me. There are no reliable sources *discussing* (rather than merely establishing the existence of) a Crnogorski community in Australia - how did it get here? why? in what way does it distinguish itself or interact with other groups in the Australian community? etc. Other ethnicities have books, theses and significant research behind them. Orderinchaos 12:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Strong keep - Notable and sourced article on a notable ethnic community in Australia. Badagnani (talk) 03:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.