Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moonshaft
=[[:Moonshaft]]=
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|I}}
:{{la|1=Moonshaft}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Moonshaft}})
There are no indications of notability. The sourcing consists entirely of primary sources and blogs, several of which have since been taken down. One of the sources appears to be a placeholder for a book written by a non-notable author. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:20, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conspiracy theories and Geography. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:20, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete as nom. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 15:49, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Your nomination counts as your delete !vote, please don't add a double !vote. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 14:12, 16 May 2025 (UTC)- Delete: Notability, lacking coverage WP:SIGCOV and contains a lot of original synthesis WP:NOR Ivey (talk - contribs) 19:55, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete The article is packed with material that is unsourced, credulous, and non-notable. What sourcing there is, as presented by the nom, is at best suspect. All about a thing that does not actually exist. WP:NOT applies. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 13:29, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
:Comment: The [https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C4%9Bs%C3%AD%C4%8Dn%C3%AD_%C5%A1achta Czech version] of the article does seem to contain book sources. Not sure if these books are reliable or relevant, though. ApexParagon (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
::Even the Czech version has long passages of unsourced material. Do we have any editors who understand Czech (does enWiki have a Czech WikiProject?) and are willing to evaluate the suitability of those books/authors? JoJo Anthrax (talk) 13:54, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
:::I know one. Not very active lately on the en.wiki project, but worth a shot. {{ping|Psax}} you might be able to help. VdSV9•♫ 18:50, 14 May 2025 (UTC)