Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mooseheads, Canberra

:{{la|Mooseheads, Canberra}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mooseheads,_Canberra Stats])

:({{Find sources|Mooseheads, Canberra}})

fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. small mentions in trove [http://trove.nla.gov.au/result?q=mooseheads+canberra&l-australian=y]. LibStar (talk) 03:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

• Delete - It's a bar. It's been a party in at least one lawsuit that obtained press coverage. Ordinary coverage for the industry. No assertion of significance. Carrite (talk) 07:13, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 10:49, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 10:49, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 10:50, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 10:50, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

• Delete unless noteworthiness can be shown - David Gerard (talk) 18:16, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
• Comment, leaning delete This bar has attracted a fair bit of coverage over the years in The Canberra Times, but aside from the fire and the bar's subsequent reopening, the stories have mainly been about misdeeds by the bar's patrons and so aren't very useful in establishing notability. The bar is certainly well known in Canberra, but I don't think that an article on it is really needed in an encyclopaedia. Nick-D (talk) 01:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.