Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/More of Our Stupid Noise
=[[More of Our Stupid Noise]]=
:{{la|More of Our Stupid Noise}} – (
:({{Find sources|More of Our Stupid Noise}})
Non-notable compilation album —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:23, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- How is a compilation album which has notable artists on it, and was released on a notable record label, not notable itself? Bearcat (talk) 21:26, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Because notability is not inherited. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 21:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Response WP:NALBUMS requires all articles to meet the basic notability requirements, including significant coverage in third party sources and the only this I can find is [http://test.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kxfixqqjldde this]. This compilation certainly exists, but nothing suggests that it is significant. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't say it was. An album that has notable artists on it and was released on a major label is not inheriting notability. And WP:NALBUMS also says that an album is notable if the artists on it are notable. Bearcat (talk) 05:49, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
- Not quite What it says is (emphasis added), "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." First off, it's a general rule of thumb. Furthermore, it assumes that we're discussing a proper studio album or release from a particular artist, and finally it's still prefaced with "may." Time-Warner have released innumerable compilation albums that include several notable artists and songs but none of them warrant an article on Wikipedia because none of them have the significant third-party coverage required of every article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:02, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.