Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moritz Neumüller

:{{la|Moritz Neumüller}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Moritz_Neum%C3%BCller Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Moritz Neumüller}})

no proof of notability no refs could be a hoax too VarunFEB2003 12:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

• Comment: Rather than speculate about a hoax, did the nominator conduct a :WP:BEFORE check, which would show for example [http://homepage.univie.ac.at/moritz.neumueller/whois.html the subject's University of Vienna homepage]? AllyD (talk) 14:31, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
• Keep. , probably speedy keep , as what is sjhown by the publications clearly meets the standards for notability. DGG ( talk ) 08:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Subject exists, but I am not sure he passes WP:PROF. His works in GScholar seem to have only several citations each; I am not sure if his impact on the field is significant. Ping User:Randykitty. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.