Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morris Massey

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 22:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Morris Massey]]=

:{{la|1=Morris Massey}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Morris Massey}})

Fails WP:BIO. Schierbecker (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, and Authors. Schierbecker (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete, mostly per WP:TNT. The article is spammy and almost entirely unsourced. He doesn't appear to have the citation counts for WP:PROF#C1. The McFeely Award may actually be significant, and can be sourced [https://nma1.org/awards-recognition/national-awards/mcfeely-award/] but unless there's more to say about Massey than one line saying he received that award, we don't have enough for an article. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete. Echoing David Eppstein that this is spammy, mostly promotional stuff. -- asilvering (talk) 01:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:SPAM, and WP:SIGCOV. In 2011, a new editor could have been excused for creating this, but in 2024, this is untenable. Everyone today knows we are not a LinkedIn nor a free web host. Bearian (talk) 15:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Devoke water 22:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.