Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MotesBooks

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:MotesBooks}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MotesBooks}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:MotesBooks}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

=[[:MotesBooks]]=

:{{la|1=MotesBooks}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=MotesBooks}})

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Organizations, Business, Companies, United States of America, and Kentucky. UtherSRG (talk) 17:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete - I find a few mentions about the publisher but nothing that meets WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:52, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.