Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MotionX

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[MotionX]]=

:{{la|MotionX}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|MotionX}})

A software brand creating applications for the Apple iPhone and iPad. One editor though this spam. It was re-submitted via AfC where another editor thought it OK. The text remains rather spammy. — RHaworth {{toolbar|separator=dot|talk | contribs }} 10:57, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete, possibly redirect to the parent company Fullpower Technologies, but that itself looks to be questionably notable at best. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:09, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete, although one must admire the persistence with which this article comes back to life after two deletions. There seems to be a special life force that wants to make sure all Wikipedia readers know about this product's specifications for the benefit of all mankind. This is not an encyclopedia article, but a product specification page. All it does is "list the features of a product" that is about to launch and can do with good publicity. Not that it costs me anything for this to be here, but it seems a straightforward case of "piggybacking on Wikipedia" for the sake of commercial promotion. The people who donate to Wikipedia do so to have an encyclopedia, not to support a repository for product pages that should be on the web server of the advertising agency, or the manufacturer, not within an encyclopedia. The door should close on Wikipedia being a web server for product sheets and promotions. And of course, the item is not notable in any case. History2007 (talk) 21:23, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. History2007 (talk) 04:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Delete. drew attention for the realistic dice applications that simulated the rolling of three dimensional dice with high precision. Hey! I've got the power of a Commodore 64 in my pocket! No showing of historical, technical, or cultural significance - therefore, not an encyclopedia subject. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 04:52, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Help Re-Write. Whoever wrote this was a marketing person. The reality is that MotionX seems to be an important technology platform tied to Smartphone innovation. That's how the article should be written. Google MotionX and there is plenty there. 225,000 results....I've taken a first pass, haven't been active in a while so maybe someone else can help. I;d hate to see something getting over 200,000 instant hits on Google for recent activity and innovation absent. Else we'd end-up with Microsoft, Google, Apple and Nokia offerings. Not what the doctor ordered I think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HuskyMoon (talk • contribs) 09:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.