Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorola W315

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Motorola W315}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorola W315}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Motorola W315}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Motorola W315]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Motorola W315}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Motorola W315}})

Unreferenced perma-stub. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Not hard to find capsule reviews, and even a couple of more inovlved reviews. But de regur reviews don't demonstrate notability. WP is not a catalog of Motorola products. mikeblas (talk) 21:59, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.