Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moulai Abadullah

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unopposed deletion, any redirect is an editorial decision.  Sandstein  11:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[Moulai Abadullah]]=

:{{la|Moulai Abadullah}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Moulai_Abadullah Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Moulai Abadullah}})

Unnotable person , no secondary references. Summichum (talk) 02:37, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:34, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:34, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:34, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

  • {{ping|Anupmehra}} He is not a Dai of dawoodi bohra but only a "saint" as considered by some dawoodi bohras, SHould be deleted Summichum (talk) 17:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione Message 18:18, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete That the subject isn't notable enough to warrant an article is clear. What isn't clear is whether a redirect is warranted or not. Abadullah is a common mispronounciation of the name Abdullah in the Indian subcontinent. It's a personal name which is about as common as Dave or Steve. There is also another, earlier Dawoodi saint commonly referred to as simply Abadullah, the same way (he actually IS notable - see Ahmad al-Wafi (Abadullah)). I don't think even a redirect can be justified here; just delete. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.