Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain Soul II

:{{la|Mountain Soul II}} ([{{fullurl:Mountain Soul II|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain Soul II}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

WP:CRYSTAL, redirect contested by Bwmoll3, who doesn't believe in redirects and is constantly rude at me for no reason at all when I harm "his" articles. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

: No justification for deletion, as the album will be released by a notable artist in a few weeks, and would just be recreated. Information for article is coming from a reliable source as well, not rumor mills. Bwmoll3 (talk) 03:17, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

::Yes. God forbid we should delete speculative information. We've just become one big crystal ball now. I think I'll write articles about her next three albums too. Do you think she'll stay on Saguaro Road until 2013, or will some other label pick her up? I'd like to put her next album on Big Machine. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:31, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

: Now you're acting like a child stamping their feet because someone objected to your deletion. Stop the hyperbole and state a reason that that is reasonable and justifiable and not "because I want to"... Bwmoll3 (talk) 03:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delete until more info like a tracklist can be found. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 03:41, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• Keep- some information is out there already, including this: [http://www.countrymusicstop.com/patty-loveless-to-release-mountain-soul-ii-in-september/], which has a track listing, and [http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/10650] which has some information on the recording process. Given that information, and a release date, I'd say there's enough that deleting the article wouldn't make sense. Umbralcorax (talk) 04:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 05:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delete - not enough info yet, the album release is still 2 months away, just wait on more info to come out CloversMallRat (talk) 06:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

• Keep: While TPH has made many good contributions to the AfD process over the years, man, that's a pretty dern uncivil nomination, and the straw man argument doesn't help. We're not talking about the artist's next three albums or about what label she might be with years from now. We're talking about an album with an announced release date, a sourced tracklist and an announced name. As the Brits say, that's good enough to be going on with.  RGTraynor  06:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delete Let's wait for the album to be released. It may prove to be notable. Stormbay (talk) 15:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• Merge - With the main article on the artist. There isn't enough here to justify having a stand-alone article but she appears to be a notable artist and this is a confirmed release. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 19:22, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• Merge and make it stick until the release. The "source" for the album is the label, not a reliable 3rd party source. This one [http://www.cmt.com/news/news-in-brief/1615536/patty-loveless-plans-mountain-soul-ii-for-september-release.jhtml] would probably be better or this one [http://www.countrystandardtime.com/news/newsitem2.asp?xid=3045]. Other possibles: [http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7015740695?New%20Patty%20Loveless%20Album%20], [http://www.countryweekly.com/patty_loveless/news/4006]. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:50, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
• Keep per User:RGTraynor. As well as, by implication, WP:HAMMER. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.