Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movebubble (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. It has been four years since the last discussion and consensus can change. The consensus in this discussion is to delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:25, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Movebubble]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movebubble}}

:{{la|Movebubble}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Movebubble_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Movebubble}})

Fails wp:gng and wp:ncorp GDX420 (talk) 11:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:57, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:57, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:GNGand WP:NCORP Most of the sources only mention the subject in passing. The sources which are about the subject are prime examples of PR Churnalism and do not impart the depth of coverage required for a serious encyclopaedia article.GDX420 (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep - the previous decision was no consensus existed for deletion. I don't see why circumstances will have changed since that decision. It clearly has some independent and substantive coverage in major papers and websites, but not enough to make it undeniably notable. Yet there doesn't seem to be an overriding sense of churnalism or dependency on press releases to justify deletion either. The first deletion debate still seems relevant and I don't see the purpose of a second. Editors should refocus and WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM. Llemiles (talk) 20:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete fails WP:NCORP. gnews reveals just passing mentions or industry related press. LibStar (talk) 23:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete. Unnotable and self-promotional. Dorama285 (talk) 19:58, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.