Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moving tips

{{ns:0|I}}

:{{la|Moving tips}} ([{{fullurl:Moving tips|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moving tips}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Fails because Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, or textbook. triwbe (talk) 18:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Non-encyclopedic and I don't see any way this can be salvaged into something keepable or anything that would ever link to it. Drunken Pirate (talk) 18:36, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Unsalvageable how-to. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:04, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
• Comment -WP:SNOW ???? --triwbe (talk) 19:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
• Snowy Delete - article title makes it obvious it can only be a 'how-to' -Hunting dog (talk) 19:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a how-to guide Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 19:26, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
• Delete this how-to guide. Cliff smith ^talk 20:45, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
• Delete It's simply a how-to.   jj137 (talk) 21:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and everyone else above. --Russ (talk) 21:45, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Annoying that this has to turn into an AFD that can have no other result then remove. It would have been easier to just snowball CSD it like the previous time it was posted. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 21:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
• Comment - I agree, but I do not see any CSD criteria that would cover it without warping the rules. --triwbe (talk) 04:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.