Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Noer (Pacitan)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Muhammad Noer (Pacitan)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Muhammad Noer (Pacitan)}})

Biography of a person, not properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing a Wikipedia inclusion criterion. The attempted notability claim is that he was involved in the creation of mosques in a village, which is in no way an automatic notability freebie without WP:GNG-worthy sourcing to support it, but the only "source" here just tangentially verifies the existence of the region the subject lived in without ever once mentioning his name at all, and thus clearly isn't about him for the purposes of helping to get him over GNG.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have any coverage in reliable sources. Bearcat (talk) 15:36, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Indonesia. Bearcat (talk) 15:36, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
• Comment: This article was created by a user who is now blocked because they poorly mass-translated articles from other Wikipedias in an apparent effort to add spam links. See also: this thread at ANI Bsoyka (t • c • g) 15:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:53, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
• Delete: Zero sources found for this person, the one source used isn't quite good enough. I didn't even know where this person was from until the tag at the end of the article for "Indonesia stubs"; all kinds of issues with this article. Oaktree b (talk) 18:43, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Mccapra (talk) 06:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, as I couldn't find any sources for this person. Although there is a mosque named after him in Pacitan, which might indicate his local notability, there isn't much information available beyond that. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
• Delete: Without in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources, a subject can’t meet WP:GNG. I agree with the nominator that the subject is not inherently notable because of his works; notability requires verification and in-depth coverage from reliable sources, which the subject lacks. GrabUp - Talk 12:51, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.