Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammadullah Khalili Qasmi

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Muhammadullah Khalili Qasmi}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Muhammadullah Khalili Qasmi}})

The subject fails WP:NACADEMIC WWGB (talk) 06:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 06:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 06:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

• Comment: The account that made this page – User:Khaliliqasmi – has a similar name to the article's subject. Possibly promotional? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DesertPipeline (talk • contribs) 08:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
• :Addendum to the above: Their user page actually lists the same exact name as the article title. DesertPipeline (talk) 08:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks essentially like an A7 case or very close. Possible WP:AUTO too. Nsk92 (talk) 13:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
• Delete No evidence of meeting WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. Maybe there's a language and alphabet barrier but with only one or two (I'm not sure) publications listed in Google Scholar, and single-digit citations, WP:PROF seems far out of reach and that's the only thing that even looks like a claim of notability in the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.